Reflecting on Wrongful Convictions of Women in Australia: Definitions, Debates and Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69970/gjlhd.v11i2.1265Abstract
The quashing of Kathleen Folbigg’s convictions in June 2023 caused many to reflect upon the way in which Australian criminal justice systems might judge women. The growing body of research into wrongful convictions of women overseas is developing an understanding of how and why the criminal justice process often fails to consider the experiences of women, incarcerates them – and makes it more difficult for their wrongful convictions to be uncovered and corrected. This article considers that research and applies its findings to known cases of wrongful convictions of women in Australia. The exploratory analysis offered in this article highlights possibilities for further research that will develop a more precise understanding of prosecution processes in Australia, the risk factors for wrongful conviction of women, and the barriers to uncovering wrongful convictions. Understanding these issues will help prevent wrongful convictions and improve pathways to justice.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.