Democratizing International Agreements in the Context of Inter-State Hierarchies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69970/gjlhd.v8i2.1210Abstract
This paper aims to contribute to the literature on accountability and world politics by bringing to the discussion some of the insights of scholarship on international hierarchy. This literature goes beyond the well-known debate between realists and liberals, and explores status-based models which highlight how both material and normative factors constitute Great Powers. This elite class of states can help to make international agreements more accountable because they have the material means of enforcement, and because their divergent interests and diverse normative orientations help to broaden representation. When the world’s Great Powers cooperate to solve global problems, and their proposals include mechanisms for dispute resolution overseen by global governance institutions, agreements are more likely to generate ‘legitimacy’, a concept which refers to weaker states’ willingness to accept the decisions of the powerful because of the sense of fairness and the benefits which accrue to those impacted by the agreement. To illustrate an example, the paper will discuss the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), an approach to nuclear non-proliferation overseen by the world’s Great Powers and accepted by other members of the international community, strong and weak alike.
References
REFERENCE LIST
A Articles/Books/Reports
Bovens, Mark, ‘Analyzing and Assessing Accountability: A Conceptual Framework’ (2007) 13(4) European Law Journal 447
Bukovansky, Mlada et al., Special Responsibilities: Global Problems and American Power, (Cambridge University Press, 2012)
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of World Politics (Palgrave Macmillan, 1977)
Dodson, Michael and Maocheir Dorraj, ‘Populism and Foreign Policy in Venezuela and Iran’ (2008) 9(1) The Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 71
Dunne, Tim, ‘Liberal Internationalism’ in John Baylis, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens (eds), The Globalization of World Politics (Oxford University Press, 2020)
Grant, Ruth and Robert Keohane, ‘Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics’ (2005) 99(1) The American Political Science Review 29
Giurlando, Philip, Eurozone Politics: Perception and Reality in Italy, the UK, and Germany (Routledge, 2015)
Held, David, ‘Democratic Accountability and Political Effectiveness from a Cosmopolitan Perspective’ (2004) 39(2) Government and Opposition 364
Heimman, Gadi, ‘What does it take to be a great power? The story of France joining the Big Five’ (2015) 41(1) Review of International Studies 185
Ikenberry, John, Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order (Princeton University Press, 2011)
Kahler, Miles, ‘Defining Accountability Up: The Global Economic Multilaterals’ (2004) 39(2) Government and Opposition 132
Kang, David, ‘The Theoretical Roots of Hierarchy in International Relations’ (2004) 58(3) Australian Journal of International Affairs 337
Krisch, Nico, ‘International Law in Times of Hegemony: Unequal Power and the Shaping of International Order’ (2005) The European Journal of International Law 369
Krotz, Ulrich and Joachim Schild, Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and embedded bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to twenty-first century politics (Oxford University Press, 2013)
Lake, David, Hierarchy in International Relations (Cornell University Press, 2009)
Larson, Deborah, Thazha Paul and William Wohlforth, ‘Status and World Order’ in Deborah Larson, Thazha Paul and William Wohlforth (eds), Status in World Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2014)
Martin, Lisa, ‘Interests, Power, and Multilateralism’ (1992) 46(4) International Organization 765
Mattern, Janice and Ayşe Zarakol, ‘Hierarchies in World Politics’ (2016) 70(3) International Organization 623
Nye, Joseph, ‘Globalization’s Democratic Deficit: How to Make International Institutions More Accountable’ (2001) 81 Foreign Affairs 2
Rapkin, David and Dan Braaten, ‘Conceptualizing Hegemonic Legitimacy’ (2009) 35(1) Review of International Studies 113
Stiglitz, Joseph, ‘Democratizing the IMF and World Bank: Governance and Accountability’ (2003) 16(1) Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 111
Trinkunas, Harold, ‘What is Really New about Venezuela’s Foreign Policy?’ (2006) 5(2) Strategic Insights 2
Wendt, Alexander and Daniel Friedheim, ‘Hierarchy under Anarchy: Informal Empire and the East German State’ (1995) 49(4) International Organization 689
Woods, Ngaire and Amrita Narlikar, ‘Governance and the Limits of Accountability: The WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank’ (2008) 53(170) International Social Science Journal 569
Zarakol, Ayse, ‘Theorizing Hierarchies: An Introduction’ in Ayşe Zarakol (ed), Hierarchies in World Politics (Cambridge University Press, 2017)
Zurn, Michael, ‘Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems’ (2004) 39(2) Government and Opposition 260
B Treaties
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, opened for signature 1 July 1968, 729 UNTS 161 (entered into force 5 March 1970)
C Other
Dehghan, Saeed, ‘Iranians Celebrate Nuclear Deal: 'This Will Bring Hope To Our Life'’, The Guardian (online, 3 April 2015) <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/apr/02/iranians-celebrate-nuclear-deal-tehran>
Farmanesh, Amir and Ebrahim Mohseni, ‘Survey Finds President Rouhani's Popularity Soaring Among Iranians’, The Guardian (online, 1 October 2015) <https://www.theguardian.com/world/iran-blog/2015/oct/01/iran-rouhani-popularity-misperceptions-nuclear-deal>
Sparks, Grace, ‘Majority Say US Should Not Withdraw from Iran Nuclear Agreement’, CNN (online, 9 May 2018) <https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/08/politics/poll-iran-agreement/index.html>
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
