Reply to Andrew Dyer's response
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69970/gjlhd.v7i1.1179Abstract
This paper is not subject to peer-review and is the final instalment of this Right to Reply series, published in this issue.
References
A Articles/Books/Reports
Dyer, Andrew, ‘Yes! To Communication about Consent; No! to Affirmative Consent: A Reply to Anna Kerr’ (2019) 7(1) Griffith Journal of Law & Human Dignity (in this issue)
Ellin, Abbey, ‘Is Sex by Deception Rape?’, New York Times (online, 23 April 2019) <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/23/well/mind/is-sex-by-deception-a-form-of-rape.html>
Wilkinson, Sophie, ‘’Rough Sex’ Doesn’t Kill, Domestic Violence Does’, Grazia (online, 18 December 2018) <https://graziadaily.co.uk/life/real-life/domestic-violence-natalie-connolly-john-broadhurst-sentence-harriet-harman-attorney-general/>
B Cases
R v Lazarus [2017] NSWCCA 279 (27 November 2017)
C Legislation
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
