EQUITY, REVENGE PORN, AND CAMBRIDGE ANALYTICA: THE DOCTRINE OF CONFIDENCE AS A PROTECTION FOR HUMAN DIGNITY IN THE TECHNOLOGIAL AGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69970/gjlhd.v6i3.1060Abstract
Breach of confidence is an equitable action that is increasingly significant for the protection of human dignity in the technological age. Its scope extends beyond the economic interests which more frequently invoke equity, to protecting dignity where an individual’s privacy interests have been violated. This paper considers the history of case development that consolidated the ability of confidence to protect dignity in its own right. It then looks at two contemporary contexts where new technologies necessitate the application of confidence to dignitary concerns: specifically, “revenge porn” cases where an individual abuses an intimate partner’s trust and privacy and in “data breach” situations where much larger entities release information of a data subject improperly. It is finally theorised that equity’s basis in conscience makes confidence well suited to protecting interests that are dignitary, rather than economic, in character. The contribution of this paper to the existing field of literature is to establish the growing utility of the doctrine of confidence as a private law action to deter and redress misuses of private information that are facilitated and amplified by technological advances.
References
REFERENCE LIST
A Articles/Books/Reports
Alpin, Tanya, ‘The Future of Breach of Confidence and the Protection of Privacy’ (2007) 7 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 137
Australian Law Reform Commission, For Your Information: Australian Privacy Law and Practice, Report No 108 (2008)
Australian Law Reform Commission, Serious Invasions of Privacy in the Digital Era, Report No 123 (2014)
Bambauer, Derek, ‘Exposed’ (2012) 98 Minnesota Law Review 2025
Bloustein, Edward J, ‘Privacy as an Aspect of Human Dignity: An Answer to Dean Prosser’ (1964) 39 New York University Law Review 962
Callinan, I D F, ‘Privacy, Confidence, Celebrity and Spectacle’ (2007) 7 Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 1
Dickie, Hans ‘Restraint of Breach of Confidence: Duchess of Argyll v Duke of Argyll’ (1966) 24 Faculty of Law Review 115
Floridi, Luciano, ‘On Human Dignity as a Foundation for the Right to Privacy’ (2016) 29 Philosophy and Technology 307
Hedlund, Richard, ‘The Theological Foundations of Equity’s Conscience’ (2015) 4 Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 119
Hobbes, Thomas, The Leviathan (Cambridge University Press, first published 1651, 1909 ed)
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Practical Philosophy, (Mary J Gregor trans, Cambridge University Press, 2006) [Trans of Grundlegung zur Metaphysik of Morals (first published 1785)]
Kennedy, Stephen, ‘Data and Dignity – Protecting the Truth of Real Things’ (2017) 7 Journal of Christian Legal Thought 20
Macnair, Mike, ‘Equity and Conscience’ (2007) 27 Oxford Journal of Cultural Studies 659
McGlynn, Clare, and Erika Rackley, ‘Image-Based Sexual Abuse’ (2017) 37 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 1
McGlynn, Clare, Erika Rackley and Ruth Houghton, ‘Beyond ‘Revenge Porn’: The Continuum of Image-Based Sexual Abuse’ (2017) 25 Feminist Legal Studies 25
Meagher, R P, Heydon, J D, and Leeming, M J, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane’s Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (Butterworths, 4th Ed, 2002)
Morgan, David, ‘Harris v Digital Pulse: The Availability of Exemplary Damages in Equity’ (2003) 29 Melbourne University Law Review 377
New South Wales Law Reform Commission, Remedies for the Serious Invasion of Privacy in New South Wales, Report No 57 (2016)
Ong, Teck H, ‘Equitable Damages: A Powerful But Often Forgotten Remedy’ (1999) 4 Deakin Law Review 61
Position (EU) No 6/2016 of the Council at First Reading with a View to the Adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Protection of Natural Persons with regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data, and Repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation) [2016] OJ C
Richardson, Megan, ‘Breach of Confidence, Surreptitiously or Accidentally Obtained Information and Privacy: Theory Versus Law’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Review 673
Richardson, Megan, ‘The Battle for Rights – Getting Data Protection Cases to Court’ (2015) 2 Oslo Law Review 23
Richardson, Megan, ‘Whither Breach of Confidence: A Right to Privacy for Australia’ (2002) 26 Melbourne University Law Review 381
Rosen, Jeffery, The Unwanted Gaze: The Destruction of Privacy in America (Vingage Books, 2000)
Rudolph, Duane, ‘Workers, Dignity, and Equitable Tolling’ (2017) 15 Northwestern Journal of Human Rights 126
Samet, Irit, ‘What Conscience Can Do For Equity’ (2012) 3 Jurisprudence 13
Senate Legal and Constitutional References Committee, Parliament of Australia, Phenomenon colloquially referred to as ‘revenge porn’ (2016)
Stuckey, Jennifer, ‘The Equitable Action for Breach of Confidence: Is Information Ever Property? (2003) 26 Sydney Law Review 402
Victorian Law Reform Commission, Surveillance in Public Places, Report No 18 (2010)
Ward, Ian, ‘A Revenger’s Tragedy’ (2017) 11 Pólemos 437
Warren, Samuel D, Brandeis, Louis D, ‘The Right to Privacy’ (1980) 4 Harvard Law Review 193
Zhand, Eric, ‘The Application of Universal Laws to Particular Cases: A Defence of Equity in Aristotelianism and Anglo-American Law’ (1996) 59 Law and Contemporary Problems 263
Zylberman, Ariel, ‘Human Dignity’ (2016) 11 Philosophy Compass 201
B Cases
Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109
Australian Broadcasting Commission v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd [2001] 208 CLR 199
Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457; [2004] UKHL 22
Canson Enterprises Ltd v Boughton & Co [1991] 3 SCR 534
Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Smith (1991) ALR 453
Cornelius v De Taranto [2001] EMLR 12
Doe v ABC [2007] VCC 281
Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2001] QB 967
Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2006] QB 125
Duchess of Argyll v Duke of Argyll [1967] 1 Ch 302
Foster v Mountford and Rigby Ltd (1976) 29 FLR 233
Franklin v Giddins [1978] Qd R 72
G v Day [1982] 1 NSWLR 24
Gee v Pritchard (1818) 36 ER 670
Giller v Procopets [2008] VSCA 236
Google Inc v Vidall-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311
Imerman v Tchenguiz [2011] 2 WLR 592
Harris v Digital Pulse (2003) 56 NSWLR 298
Hellawell v Chief Constable of Derbyshire [1995] 1 WLR 804
James Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 32
Kwok v Thang [1999] NSESC 1034
Lake v Wal-Mart Stores Inc, 582 NW 2d 231, 235 (Minn, 1998)
Lord Ashburton v Pape [1913] 2 Ch 469
Melvin v Reid 112 Cal App 285 (1931)
Moorgate Tobacco v Philip Morris Ltd (No 2) (1984) 156 CLR 414
Nationwide News Pty Ltd v Naidu (2007) 71 NSWLR 417
Pollard v Photographic Company (1888) 40 Ch D 345.
Prince Albert v Strange [1849] Eng R 255; (1849) 41 ER 1171
Saltman Engineering v Campbell Engineering (1947) 65 RPC 203
Stephens v Avery [1988] Ch 449
Swinney v Chief Constable of Northumbria Police Force [1997] QB 464
Wainwright v Home Office [2004] 2 AC 406
Warman International Ltd v Dwyer (1995) 182 CLR 544
Wilkinson v Downton (1897) 2 QB 57
Wilson v Ferguson [2015] WASC 15
X v Y [1988] 2 All ER 648
C Legislation
Crimes Amendment (Intimate Images) Act 2017 (NSW)
Human Rights Act 1998 (UK)
Privacy Act 1988 (Cth)
Supreme Court Act 1986 (Vic)
D Other
Cadwalladr, Carol ‘I made Steve Bannon’s psychological warfare tool:’ meet the data war whistleblower’, The Guardian (online), 18 March 2018 <https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/data-war-whistleblower-christopher-wylie-faceook-nix-bannon-trump>
Cadwalladr, Carol, and Emma Graham Harrison, ‘Revealed: 50 Million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach’, The Guardian (online), 18 March 2018 <https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/mar/17/cambridge-analytica-facebook-influence-us-election>
Caldwell, Felicity, ‘Revenge porn to become a criminal offence under Labor’ Brisbane Times (online), 22 November 2017 <https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/queensland-election-2017/revenge-porn-to-become-a-criminal-offence-under-labor-20171122-p4yx5i.html>
Lewis, Paul, ‘Trump adviser John Bolton worked with Cambridge Analytica on Youtube voter experiment’ The Guardian (online) 24 March 2018 <https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/mar/23/john-bolton-cambridge-analytica-videos-donald-trump>
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (Cth), ‘Statement from the Australian Information and Privacy Commissioner on Facebook and Cambridge Analytica’ (Media Release, 20 March 2018) <https://www.oaic.gov.au/media-and-speeches/statements/
facebook-and-cambridge-analytica>
Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (Cth), ‘Investigation into Facebook opened’ (Media Release, 5 April 2018) <https://www.oaic.gov.au/media-and-speeches/
statements/facebook-and-cambridge-analytica>
Ehrenkranz, Melanie, ‘Facebook Revenge Porn Case Shows How Police Let a Predator Get Away’ Gizmodo (online), 14 January 2018 <http://gizmodo.com/facebook-revenge-porn-case-shows-how-police-let-a-perpe-1822024163>
Kleeman, Jenny, ‘YouTube Star Wins Damages in Landmark UK ‘Revenge Porn’ Case’ The Guardian (online), 17 January 2018 <https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jan/17/youtube-star-chrissy-chambers-wins-damages-in-landmark-uk-revenge-porn-case>
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.